Skip to main content
Site logo
North Somerset
Conservatives

Main navigation

  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Events
  • Get involved
  • People
  • Surgeries
  • Contact
Site logo
North Somerset
Conservatives

Residents Should not Pay

  • Tweet
Wednesday, 3 February, 2021

An Article Printed In The North Somerset Times Written By David Oyns 

Strange. If a vehicle, household appliance or other item is found to be unsafe or defective it is much more likely than not recalled by the manufacturer and made safe at no cost to the owner. Indeed, even compensation may be paid to the customer. Why then is this not the case with flammable cladding on properties?

 

Television news on 28th January carried a report of a young woman forced to declare bankruptcy following steep increases in costs associated with a flat she had owned for a year. She had no control and was not given any details of the building design, materials used or other issues but bought in good faith. Her forced bankruptcy, due entirely to failures of others, will affect the rest of her life. This is intolerable, indefensible and totally unacceptable.

 

The manufacturer knew of its flammability, it would have had to have been signed off in building regulations, fire safety must have been considered and signed off. All relevant regulations appertaining to the application of such cladding was tragically found to be inadequate in the case of Grenfell.

 

Purchasers of affected properties were not advised of the potential dangers of such cladding. All agencies involved in the design, regulation and construction of affected buildings were, to a greater or lesser extent, responsible for the fitting of potentially unsafe cladding to those affected buildings and could have raised the issue but,, that said the aforementioned may have adhered to building regulations of the time.

 

Residents in buildings thought to be at risk bought their properties in good faith with every expectation that the construction was sound and materials safe. They should not be expected to foot the bill to replace unsafe construction materials installed by the builders and presumably approved by the developers and their technical departments at the design stage. A solution must be found to make the buildings safe if they are found not to be so.

 

It may be necessary for Government to provide funding initially but it is certainly not acceptable for the taxpayer to pick up this bill. It is the individuals who profited from those developments in which  potentially unsafe materials were installed that should ultimately pay, though specifications drawn up by the building regulator of the time may lead culpability elsewhere.

 

David Oyns

Portishead

 

 

  • Local News

You may also be interested in

David Oyns

David Oyns

Portishead East Candidate

David is a retired teacher who taught at Warsett School, Brotton, Yorks, Portway School, Shirehampton, and Clifton College. 

Budget 2021: The Chancellor's Speech in Full

Budget 2021: The Chancellor's Speech in Full

Wednesday, 3 March, 2021

Read and Watch the Chancellor's Budget announcement here in full. One year ago, we promised the British people we would do whatever it takes to provide security and stability.

Show only

  • Articles
  • Local News
  • National News

Donate

We need to build a strong voice for local Conservatives and we can only do that with your help.

Any donation will make a difference.

accepted-payment-cards

North Somerset Conservatives

Footer

  • About RSS
  • Accessibility
  • Cookies
  • Privacy
  • Become a Councillor
  • Conservative Club
  • Conservative Policy Forum
  • Conservative Women's Organisation
  • Vote by Post
  • Young Conservatives
Site logoPromoted by Jago Brockway on behalf of North Somerset Conservatives both of 16 Northgate, Bridgwater, Somerset TA6 3EU
Copyright 2021 North Somerset Conservatives. All rights reserved.
Powered by Bluetree